C-IBP-2502模擬対策、C-IBP-2502練習問題集

すべての顧客の誠実な要件を考慮して、C-IBP-2502テストの質問は、高品質の製品と思いやりのあるアフターサービスを備えた候補者に約束します。試験での99％の合格率、購入前の無料トライアル、安全なプライバシー保護など、C-IBP-2502トレーニング資料の多くの利点がよく認識されています。顧客の観点から、最適なC-IBP-2502模擬試験へのすべての顧客の信頼とフィードバックを大切にし、最良の選択です。

我々のJPTestKingサイトは一番高質量のC-IBP-2502試験資料と行き届いたアフタサービスを提供して協力します。SAP　C-IBP-2502問題集は試験の範囲を広くカバーして、試験の通過率は高いです。他のサイトと比較して、我が社のC-IBP-2502試験問題集を購買すると決定します。商品の税金について、この問題を心配できません。顧客の利益を保証するために、税金は弊社の方で支払います。

>> C-IBP-2502模擬対策 <<

C-IBP-2502練習問題集、C-IBP-2502資格取得

C-IBP-2502認定試験は現在で本当に人気がある試験ですね。まだこの試験の認定資格を取っていないあなたも試験を受ける予定があるのでしょうか。確かに、これは困難な試験です。しかし、難しいといっても、高い点数を取って楽に試験に合格できないというわけではないです。では、まだ試験に合格するショートカットがわからないあなたは、受験のテクニックを知りたいですか。今教えてあげますよ。それはJPTestKingのC-IBP-2502問題集を利用することです。

SAP Certified Associate - SAP IBP for Supply Chain 認定 C-IBP-2502 試験問題 (Q67-Q72):

質問 # 67
Which of the following key functions are supported by SAP IBP for sales and operations? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

A. Simple statistical forecast
B. Multi-level supply planning heuristics
C. SAP Product Lifecycle Management
D. Allocation planning

正解：A、B

解説：
SAP IBP for Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) supports demand, supply, and inventory alignment. Key functions are defined by its modules.
* Option A: Allocation planningThis is incorrect. Allocation planning is specific to SAP IBP for Response and Supply (order-based), not the S&OP module, which focuses on time-series planning.
* Option B: Simple statistical forecastThis is correct. S&OP includes demand planning with simple statistical forecasts (e.g., moving average, exponential smoothing), a core function, per SAP IBP's demand documentation.
* Option C: Multi-level supply planning heuristicsThis is correct. S&OP supports multi-level supply planning via heuristics (e.g., infinite/finite) to balance supply across the network, a key feature, per SAP IBP's supply planning guides.
* Option D: SAP Product Lifecycle ManagementThis is incorrect. SAP PLM is a separate system, not a function of SAP IBP S&OP, though IBP can integrate with lifecycle data.
Thus, B and C are supported S&OP functions, per SAP IBP's official scope.

質問 # 68
What function would you use to configure a year-to-date calculation?

A. Rolling Aggregation
B. Cumulative Aggregation
C. Last Period Aggregation
D. Dynamic Rolling Aggregation

正解：B

解説：
A year-to-date (YTD) calculation in SAP IBP sums values from the start of the year to the current period, a common time-series requirement.
* Option A: Rolling AggregationThis is incorrect. Rolling aggregation typically refers to a moving window (e.g., last 3 months), not a fixed YTD scope.
* Option B: Last Period AggregationThis is incorrect. Last period aggregation focuses on the most recent period, not a cumulative YTD total.
* Option C: Cumulative AggregationThis is correct. The CUMULATE function in SAP IBP (e.g., KF2
= CUMULATE(KF1)) calculates a running total from the start of the horizon (e.g., year) to each period, ideal for YTD, per SAP IBP's calculation documentation.
* Option D: Dynamic Rolling AggregationThis is incorrect. Dynamic rolling implies a flexible window, not a fixed YTD accumulation.
Thus, C is the correct function for a YTD calculation, per SAP IBP's official capabilities.

質問 # 69
Which unified planning processes' data is commonly reviewed in SAP IBP for sales and operations? Note:
There are 2 correct answers to this question.

A. Constrained Demand Plan
B. Consensus Demand Plan
C. Global Demand Plan
D. Inventory Plan

正解：B、D

解説：
SAP IBP for Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) unifies demand, supply, and inventory processes, with key data reviewed in the S&OP cycle, per SAP IBP's S&OP documentation.
* Option A: Global Demand PlanThis is incorrect. "Global Demand Plan" is not a standard term in SAP IBP S&OP; it's typically "Consensus Demand Plan" after collaboration.
* Option B: Constrained Demand PlanThis is incorrect. Constrained demand is more relevant to supply planning or response, not the unified S&OP review process.
* Option C: Inventory PlanThis is correct. The Inventory Plan (e.g., safety stock, target inventory) is reviewed in S&OP to ensure alignment with demand and supply, a key unified process, per SAP IBP's documentation.
* Option D: Consensus Demand PlanThis is correct. The Consensus Demand Plan, finalized after S&OP collaboration, is a central data point reviewed to balance supply and inventory, per SAP IBP's S&OP workflow.
Thus, C and D are commonly reviewed in S&OP, per SAP IBP's official processes.

質問 # 70
You need to use your resource cost-effectively with a certain minimum use, even if it means producing more than demand. Which solutions would apply to this scenario? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

A. Excess stock can be generated and will need to be staged in an overflow warehouse
B. Capacity leveling will be possible for production and storage resources
C. Balance can be achieved between excessive prebuild and minimum use by incorporating violation costs
D. Minimum capacity utilization will result in pull production

正解：A、C

解説：
This scenario involves optimizing resource use with a minimum threshold, potentially overproducing, in SAP IBP's supply planning, per its documentation.
* Option A: Excess stock can be generated and will need to be staged in an overflow warehouseThis is correct. Overproduction to meet minimum use generates excess stock, requiring storage (e.g., overflow warehouse), a practical outcome, per SAP IBP's planning behavior.
* Option B: Capacity leveling will be possible for production and storage resourcesThis is incorrect.
Capacity leveling (smoothing production) is a PP/DS feature, not standard in IBP's time-series planning.
* Option C: Balance can be achieved between excessive prebuild and minimum use by incorporating violation costsThis is correct. The Supply Optimizer can balance minimum utilization (via costs) and excess production (via inventory costs), a supported solution, per SAP IBP's optimization features.
* Option D: Minimum capacity utilization will result in pull productionThis is incorrect. Pull production (demand-driven) contradicts producing beyond demand; this scenario aligns with push logic.
Thus, A and C apply, per SAP IBP's official supply planning capabilities.

質問 # 71
What is an example of a commonly used time-independent key figure?

A. A special key figure marked as an aggregate key figure (aggregate constraint)
B. A currency conversion key figure, such as Exchange Rate
C. Any attribute as a key figure
D. A unit of measure key figure, such as UoM Conversion Factor

正解：C

解説：
In SAP IBP, key figures can be time-dependent (e.g., forecast quantities over weeks) or time-independent (static values not tied to time periods). Time-independent key figures are often used for constants or attributes in planning calculations.
* Option A: A special key figure marked as an aggregate key figure (aggregate constraint)This is incorrect. Aggregate key figures (e.g., summing demand across products) are typically time-dependent, as they reflect data over a planning horizon, not static values.
* Option B: A unit of measure key figure, such as UoM Conversion FactorThis is incorrect in this context. While UoM Conversion Factor is time-independent (e.g., 1 kg = 1000 g), it's technically a master data attribute, not a key figure in SAP IBP's standard terminology. Key figures are editable or calculated, whereas UoM factors are static settings.
* Option C: Any attribute as a key figureThis is correct. In SAP IBP, attributes (e.g., Product Category, Customer Priority) can be configured as time-independent key figures via the "Attribute as Key Figure" feature. For example, a Product's "Safety Stock Target" could be a static key figure used across all periods, a common practice in supply planning, as per SAP IBP's configuration options.
* Option D: A currency conversion key figure, such as Exchange RateThis is incorrect. Exchange rates can vary over time (e.g., monthly rates), making them time-dependent in most cases. Even if static, they're typically master data or external inputs, not a "commonly used" key figure example in SAP IBP.
Thus, C is the best example of a commonly used time-independent key figure, aligning with SAP IBP's flexibility to model attributes as static key figures.

質問 # 72
......

人々はそれぞれ自分の人生計画があります。違った選択をしたら違った結果を取得しますから、選択は非常に重要なことです。JPTestKingのSAPのC-IBP-2502試験トレーニング資料はIT職員が自分の高い目標を達成することを助けます。この資料は問題と解答に含まれていて、実際の試験問題と殆ど同じで、最高のトレーニング資料とみなすことができます。

C-IBP-2502練習問題集: https://www.jptestking.com/C-IBP-2502-exam.html

あなたはきっとSAPのC-IBP-2502試験に合格できますから、SAP C-IBP-2502模擬対策その中の試験、どちらを受験しましたか、次に、ソフトウェアバージョンは実際のC-IBP-2502実際のテストガイドをシミュレートしますが、Windowsオペレーティングシステムでのみ実行できます、誰もがC-IBP-2502認定を取得することは容易ではなく、特に散発的な時間を十分に活用できず、生産的な方法で勉強できない人々にとっては容易ではありません、今多くのIT技術会社は職員がSAPのC-IBP-2502資格認定を持つのを要求します、私たちは君のIT技能を増強させられますし、君の簡単にSAPのC-IBP-2502認定試験に合格することができます、あなたはどこで有効の認定練習資料を取れ、C-IBP-2502実際テストの準備に使用されるのを知りたい。

兄上の次に強大な力を持つドラクルの血を継ぐお前の座も狙われている、ストーカーはひどいよ、あなたはきっとSAPのC-IBP-2502試験に合格できますから、その中の試験、どちらを受験しましたか、次に、ソフトウェアバージョンは実際のC-IBP-2502実際のテストガイドをシミュレートしますが、Windowsオペレーティングシステムでのみ実行できます。

効果的なC-IBP-2502模擬対策試験-試験の準備方法-認定するC-IBP-2502練習問題集

誰もがC-IBP-2502認定を取得することは容易ではなく、特に散発的な時間を十分に活用できず、生産的な方法で勉強できない人々にとっては容易ではありません、今多くのIT技術会社は職員がSAPのC-IBP-2502資格認定を持つのを要求します。

Tim Clark Tim Clark

Biography

C-IBP-2502模擬対策、C-IBP-2502練習問題集

C-IBP-2502練習問題集、C-IBP-2502資格取得

SAP Certified Associate - SAP IBP for Supply Chain 認定 C-IBP-2502 試験問題 (Q67-Q72):

効果的なC-IBP-2502模擬対策試験-試験の準備方法-認定するC-IBP-2502練習問題集

Quick Links

Resources

Support